Re: mlock() return value issue in kernel 2.6.23.17

["Halesh S" <halesh.s@india.com>]

Hi,

Thanks everyone.
I confirm that the patch fixes the issue with Rlimit and invalid address.

Signed-off-by: halesh.sadashiv@ap.sony.com

Thanks,
Halesh



> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Subject: Re: mlock() return value issue in kernel 2.6.23.17
> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:23:40 +0900
> 
> 
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> > I assume that you tested it too?
> 
> Yes, my x86_64 box works well.
> 
> sorry, ambiguity e-mail.
> 
> halesh's test check two point.
>    - mlock rlimit
>    - invlid address range
> 
> and, I think rlimit already works well.
> So, I ask halesh re-confirming.
> 
> > If it comes down to a choice between complying with SuS versus
> > complying with earlier Linux versions then we'd usually prefer to
> > comply with earlier Linux versions.
> 
> I see.
> 
> > I queued this, but would prefer to await confirmation that it has been
> > tested to take us back to the 2.6.18 interface, please.
> 
> Yes.
> this patch wasn't tested on split-lru yet.
> I'll do that. (and probably fix it)
> 
> > Also, please send a Signed-off-by: for this change.
> 
> Agghh, sorry. it is stupid forgotten.

>


=


-- 
_______________________________________________
Search for products and services at: 
http://search.mail.com