From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758000AbYHATYe (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:24:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758084AbYHATYB (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:24:01 -0400 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.28]:52511 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757973AbYHATX6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:23:58 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=pqs1d1/ryprZhMF1+JAgZKl6YWa9AKIDrEfblo3CrDrUWWHJ1jEKIRGrhHIgzPC1Cq 1dsNpFgxWR0QX4RjdMmi28sDURbvjy4YOAJPbZITcLWyAyp6+Rc8nRiXW7Nfletp37nO AVGducvzg4qrQCs1+Wj596CL66hv97a2BboBQ= Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:23:52 -0400 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Linus Torvalds Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andrew Morton , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-input@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 30 Message-ID: <20080801151758.ZZRA012@mailhub.coreip.homeip.net> References: <20080730170635.f737ffe9.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080731104437.5e5669bc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080731141302.ZZRA012@mailhub.coreip.homeip.net> <200807312048.57575.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080731145023.ZZRA012@mailhub.coreip.homeip.net> <20080731151625.ZZRA012@mailhub.coreip.homeip.net> <20080731194207.GA12233@anvil.corenet.prv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:12:19PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Ok, I apparently missed this whole subthread yesterday, only getting back > to it when going over my old queues. > > On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > Input: paper over a bug in Synaptics X driver > > Yeah, it's not pretty, but how about moving that EV_KEY thing into the > switch() statement? I want to to be visually separated. It is not a hot path so extra comparison won't hurt us. > Also, the printk could certainly be a bit more useful. I think I will follow Andrew's advice and point people to a page on kernel.org (to be written). > have that four-deep indentation by just splitting that horrible function > up a bit. > > IOW, start off with a patch like the appended, Makes sense. Signed-off-by please ;) -- Dmitry