From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755673AbYHBOFw (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Aug 2008 10:05:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752355AbYHBOFp (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Aug 2008 10:05:45 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:39333 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752215AbYHBOFo (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Aug 2008 10:05:44 -0400 Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 09:05:42 -0500 From: Paul Jackson To: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Travis Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpuset: use seq_cpumask(), seq_nodemask() Message-Id: <20080802090542.51052006.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20080802113131.GB3536@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> References: <20080802113131.GB3536@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.12.0; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alexey wrote: > Folks might want to boot with NR_CPUS=4096 and see what happens, > m->count games don't look promising. :-) That comment is rather heavily dependent on the context of both: 1) the previous patch comment, and 2) booting and seeing. Could you rewrite it, so that it doesn't depend on such context, and can be read and understood, by itself? -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.940.382.4214