From: Karsten Keil <kkeil@suse.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de,
"Andreas.Eversberg" <Andreas.Eversberg@versatel.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Fix remaining big endian issue of hfcmulti
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 23:02:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080805210239.GB6052@pingi.kke.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0808051140250.3257@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 11:42:56AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Karsten Keil wrote:
> >
> > Maybe we can use the trick from lib/iomap.c to detect which
> > kind of IO is needed, but unfortunately PIO_OFFSET, PIO_MASK and
> > PIO_RESERVED are not exported so it would need to copy the defines, which
> > isn't a really clean solution.
>
> Even if they were exported, you couldn't.
>
> lib/iomap.c is _not_ generic code. It's a library function for
> architectures that don't do it some other way. But various architectures
> can choose to not use lib/iomap.c at all - for example, they may have MMIO
> and PIO in the same address space, so they don't need the conditionals at
> all (because all the work was done at mapping time, not at runtime).
>
> So if you actually have different models of operation for PIO and MMIO,
> then yes, you need to handle that in the driver itself.
>
One question here, what is the better approach to do such a different
implementation, use one local function like
static void
my_out32(struct card *c, u_int offset, u-int data)
{
if (c->mode == MMIO) {
...
} else {
...
}
}
or use 2 function, one for the MMIO and one for the PIO model and then use
indirect calls (like c->my_out32(...)) ?
--
Karsten Keil
SuSE Labs
ISDN and VOIP development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr.5 90409 Nuernberg, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-05 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-02 14:35 Karsten Keil
2008-08-04 12:03 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-04 14:29 ` Karsten Keil
2008-08-05 4:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-05 11:31 ` Karsten Keil
2008-08-05 13:04 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-05 17:25 ` Karsten Keil
2008-08-05 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-05 21:02 ` Karsten Keil [this message]
2008-08-05 21:23 ` Sean MacLennan
2008-08-05 21:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-05 21:59 ` Sean MacLennan
2008-08-05 23:04 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-05 23:38 ` Sean MacLennan
2008-08-06 0:18 ` Karsten Keil
2008-08-06 0:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-05 21:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-05 21:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-05 21:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-07 11:01 AW: " Andreas.Eversberg
2008-08-07 13:46 ` Karsten Keil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080805210239.GB6052@pingi.kke.suse.de \
--to=kkeil@suse.de \
--cc=Andreas.Eversberg@versatel.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®