From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754530AbYHGM0j (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Aug 2008 08:26:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755086AbYHGMYs (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Aug 2008 08:24:48 -0400 Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:53405 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754994AbYHGMYq (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Aug 2008 08:24:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:29:31 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , netdev Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for August 6 (8390 et al) Message-ID: <20080807102931.1bb0607d@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <20080806182828.6bfe0a16.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080806172148.7fac5999.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:20:07 +0200 (CEST) Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > One randconfig ends with: > > > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `wd_probe1': > > wd.c:(.init.text+0x6179): undefined reference to `NS8390p_init' > > make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 > > drivers/net/Makefile has: > > obj-$(CONFIG_WD80x3) += wd.o 8390.o > > So either wd_probe1() should call NS8390_init(), or obj-$(CONFIG_WD80x3) > should link with 8390p.o. Don't know which is the appropriate change > here (my gut feeling says the latter). Safest is the latter. The shared memory interface on the wd is full speed 8 or 16bit (depending on card/jumpers) but I'm not clear about the NIC. Most of the performance hit is on the packet transfer which is private methods on this device so using 8390p won't make a big difference on this board anyway.