From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
nigel@nigel.suspend2.net, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
mingo@elte.hu, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 3/8] kexec jump: check code size in control page
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:09:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080808140938.GE3840@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1218178356.22039.76.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com>
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 02:52:36PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> Kexec/Kexec-jump require code size in control page is less than
> PAGE_SIZE/2. This patch add link-time checking for this.
>
> ASSERT() of ld link script is used as the link-time checking
> mechanism.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_32.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/relocate_kernel_32.S | 10 +++++++---
> arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux_32.lds.S | 2 ++
> arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux_check_32.lds.S | 7 +++++++
> include/asm-x86/kexec.h | 4 ++++
> 5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_32.c
> @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ void machine_kexec(struct kimage *image)
> }
>
> control_page = page_address(image->control_code_page);
> - memcpy(control_page, relocate_kernel, PAGE_SIZE/2);
> + memcpy(control_page, relocate_kernel, KEXEC_CONTROL_CODE_MAX_SIZE);
>
> relocate_kernel_ptr = control_page;
> page_list[PA_CONTROL_PAGE] = __pa(control_page);
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/relocate_kernel_32.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/relocate_kernel_32.S
> @@ -20,10 +20,11 @@
> #define PAGE_ATTR (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_RW | _PAGE_ACCESSED | _PAGE_DIRTY)
> #define PAE_PGD_ATTR (_PAGE_PRESENT)
>
> -/* control_page + PAGE_SIZE/2 ~ control_page + PAGE_SIZE * 3/4 are
> - * used to save some data for jumping back
> +/* control_page + KEXEC_CONTROL_CODE_MAX_SIZE
> + * ~ control_page + PAGE_SIZE * 3/4 are used to save some data for
> + * jumping back
> */
Hi Huang,
Above comment is not very clear. Can you please elaborate it. I thought
that PAGE_SIZE/2 is used for control code and rest half is shared between
kjump data and stack. What is PAGE_SIZE *3/4?
> -#define DATA(offset) (PAGE_SIZE/2+(offset))
> +#define DATA(offset) (KEXEC_CONTROL_CODE_MAX_SIZE+(offset))
>
> /* Minimal CPU state */
> #define ESP DATA(0x0)
> @@ -376,3 +377,6 @@ swap_pages:
> popl %ebx
> popl %ebp
> ret
> +
> + .globl kexec_control_code_size
> +.set kexec_control_code_size, . - relocate_kernel
> --- a/include/asm-x86/kexec.h
> +++ b/include/asm-x86/kexec.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,10 @@
> # define PAGES_NR 17
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> +# define KEXEC_CONTROL_CODE_MAX_SIZE 2048
> +#endif
> +
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
> #include <linux/string.h>
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux_32.lds.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux_32.lds.S
> @@ -209,3 +209,5 @@ SECTIONS
>
> DWARF_DEBUG
> }
> +
> +#include "vmlinux_check_32.lds.S"
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux_check_32.lds.S
> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> +/*
> + * Link time checks
> + */
> +
> +#include <asm/kexec.h>
> +
> +ASSERT(kexec_control_code_size <= KEXEC_CONTROL_CODE_MAX_SIZE, "kexec control code size is too big")
Will it make sense to move it into vmlinux_32.lds.S itself? Creating a separate
file for a single check seems superfluous.
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-08 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-08 6:52 Huang Ying
2008-08-08 14:09 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2008-08-11 1:02 ` Huang Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080808140938.GE3840@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nigel@nigel.suspend2.net \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome