From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [revert] mysql+oltp regression
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:14:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080811131400.GA909@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48A038A6.4010104@novell.com>
* Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> wrote:
>>> Speaking of this: Another patch I submitted to you Ingo (had to do
>>> with updating the load_weight inside task_setprio) seems to also
>>> have this phenomenon: e.g. its technically correct but further
>>> testing has revealed negative repercussions elsewhere. So please
>>> ignore that patch (or revert if you already pulled in, but I don't
>>> think you have). Ill try to look into this issue as well.
>>
>> ok, under which thread/subject is that? Not queued in tip/sched/*
>> yet, correct?
>>
> Here is the original thread:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/3/416
>
> I do not believe you have queued it anywhere (public anyway) yet.
>
> Note I have already invalidated 1/2, and now I am retracting 2/2 as
> well. (1/2 is actually a bogus patch, 2/2 is "technically correct"
> but causes ripples in the load balancer that need to be sorted out
> first.
ok, thanks. I'm curious, what are those ripple effects? Stability or
performance?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-11 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-11 11:32 Mike Galbraith
2008-08-11 11:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-11 12:27 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-08-11 12:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-11 12:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-11 13:03 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-08-11 13:14 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-08-11 13:19 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-08-11 13:27 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-08-11 13:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-11 13:29 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080811131400.GA909@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®