From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756025AbYHKRDT (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:03:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756248AbYHKRCp (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:02:45 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:42293 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756245AbYHKRCn (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:02:43 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:02:19 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: akpm@osdl.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de, Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: remove empty lines from stack traces/oopses Message-ID: <20080811170219.GJ4524@elte.hu> References: <20080731235137.GA4816@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080731235137.GA4816@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, > unsigned long *stack, unsigned long bp, char *log_lvl) > { > - printk("\nCall Trace:\n"); > + printk("Call Trace:\n"); > dump_trace(task, regs, stack, bp, &print_trace_ops, log_lvl); > - printk("\n"); > } hm, it's nice to have stack traces stand out a bit, and to not get the 'Call Trace' embedded in the middle of a printk (which happens to crash or produce a stack dump). > void show_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, > @@ -386,6 +385,7 @@ show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, > printk(" %016lx", *stack++); > touch_nmi_watchdog(); > } > + printk("\n"); > show_trace_log_lvl(task, regs, sp, bp, log_lvl); > } > > @@ -443,7 +443,6 @@ void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs) > printk("Stack: "); > show_stack_log_lvl(NULL, regs, (unsigned long *)sp, > regs->bp, ""); > - printk("\n"); > > printk(KERN_EMERG "Code: "); just to make sure i get the gist of your change, do you have a 'before' and 'after' sample oops, so that we can see the difference? Ingo