From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756933AbYHKT1q (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:27:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756743AbYHKT1e (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:27:34 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:39108 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753436AbYHKT1d (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:27:33 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:27:13 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Peter Oruba Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Dmitry Adamushko , Max Krasnyansky , Tigran Aivazian , LKML Subject: Re: [patch 4/5] [PATCH 4/5] x86: Minor correction to Intel microcode patch loader. Message-ID: <20080811192713.GG12788@elte.hu> References: <20080806152117.198754464@amd.com> <20080806152320.081968686@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080806152320.081968686@amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Peter Oruba wrote: > Signed-off-by: Peter Oruba > --- > arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c > index 4ab6ce3..8d69470 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c > @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ static void apply_microcode(int cpu) > unsigned long flags; > unsigned int val[2]; > int cpu_num = raw_smp_processor_id(); > - struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = get_ucode_cpu_info(cpu); > + struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = get_ucode_cpu_info(cpu_num); hm, this does not apply to tip/x86/microcode nor tip/master nor linus/master. Does it fix a bug in one of the earlier patches in this 5/5 queue? Ingo