From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753366AbYHLDeX (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:34:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751200AbYHLDeJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:34:09 -0400 Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:56805 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751763AbYHLDeH (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:34:07 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:33:54 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: "John W. Linville" , "David S. Miller" , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , LKML , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Adrian Bunk , Luis Rodriguez , Sujith Manoharan Subject: Re: ath9k build failure Message-Id: <20080812133354.2eadf82d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20080811164657.GE6128@tesla> References: <20080811162040.ed7b8ab7.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080811164657.GE6128@tesla> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__12_Aug_2008_13_33_54_+1000_sXfP.3fTI1mnT3M3" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Tue__12_Aug_2008_13_33_54_+1000_sXfP.3fTI1mnT3M3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Luis, On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:46:57 -0700 "Luis R. Rodriguez" wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 11:20:40PM -0700, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >=20 > > Today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this: > >=20 > > drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/hw.c: In function 'ath9k_hw_spur_mitigate': > > drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/hw.c:4925: internal compiler error: in expan= d_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9199 > >=20 > > This is a driver that is in Linus' tree and has no patches in the > > linux-next tree. > >=20 > > The original work around talked about applying the patch twice, so I > > applied the below patch. >=20 > this is also in wireless-testing. I also see this in linux-2.6 > under b08cbcd4546445740c2a04291204b56f8baf7be2. Not sure how this didn't > get through linux-next. That is only the first application of the patch, my patch is a fix of a second instance of the same code. See Adrian's post. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Tue__12_Aug_2008_13_33_54_+1000_sXfP.3fTI1mnT3M3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkihBKIACgkQjjKRsyhoI8wPmwCgkSAWadUWxee3sNXBYDWqYac8 0HcAni83vmUeEzDjl2w0BQHIc24pA4tn =H0sY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__12_Aug_2008_13_33_54_+1000_sXfP.3fTI1mnT3M3--