Re: [PATCH] [WATCHDOG] mpc8xxx_wdt: fix modular build

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>]

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 04:23:41PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>...
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/mpc8xxx_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/mpc8xxx_wdt.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct mpc8xxx_wdt_type {
>  };
>  
>  static struct mpc8xxx_wdt __iomem *wd_base;
> +static int mpc8xxx_wdt_init_late(void);
>  
>  static u16 timeout = 0xffff;
>  module_param(timeout, ushort, 0);
> @@ -213,6 +214,12 @@ static int __devinit mpc8xxx_wdt_probe(struct of_device *ofdev,
>  	else
>  		timeout_sec = timeout / freq;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_8xxx_WDT_MODULE
> +	ret = mpc8xxx_wdt_init_late();
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_unmap;
> +#endif

In mpc8xxx_wdt_probe()?

Isn't mpc8xxx_wdt_init() the correct place?

>  	pr_info("WDT driver for MPC8xxx initialized. mode:%s timeout=%d "
>  		"(%d seconds)\n", reset ? "reset" : "interrupt", timeout,
>  		timeout_sec);
> @@ -280,7 +287,7 @@ static struct of_platform_driver mpc8xxx_wdt_driver = {
>   * very early to start pinging the watchdog (misc devices are not yet
>   * available), and later module_init() just registers the misc device.
>   */
> -static int __init mpc8xxx_wdt_init_late(void)
> +static int mpc8xxx_wdt_init_late(void)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> @@ -295,7 +302,9 @@ static int __init mpc8xxx_wdt_init_late(void)
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +#ifndef CONFIG_8xxx_WDT_MODULE

Your #ifdef is correct, but "#ifdef MODULE" would express this better.

>  module_init(mpc8xxx_wdt_init_late);
> +#endif
>  
>  static int __init mpc8xxx_wdt_init(void)
>  {

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed