mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: "Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Pavel Machek" <pavel@suse.cz>,
	"Robert Richter" <robert.richter@amd.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>, "Andi Kleen" <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	"Philippe Elie" <phil.el@wanadoo.fr>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: oprofile + hibernation = badness
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:15:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808182316.00854.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19f34abd0808181408q8a38fc0hfaff02fab6e20681@mail.gmail.com>

On Monday, 18 of August 2008, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > Apparently nmi_suspend() conflicts with oprofile somehow.  Also, the offlining
> > of non-boot CPUs may confuse it.  It would be helpful to check if the CPU
> > hotplug works with oprofile.
> 
> That is a good suggestion :-)
> 
> Here is offlining:
> 
> CPU 1 is now offline
> lockdep: fixing up alternatives.
> SMP alternatives: switching to UP code
> CPU0 attaching NULL sched-domain.
> WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU1
> CPU1 attaching NULL sched-domain.
> CPU0 attaching sched-domain:
>  domain 0: span 0 level CPU
>   groups: 0
> WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU1
> WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU1
> WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU1
> [repeat last message indefinitely]
> 
> Here is onlining:
> 
> Booting processor 1/1 ip 6000
> Initializing CPU#1
> WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU1
> WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU1
> Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 5986.15 BogoMIPS (lpj=29930790)
> CPU: Trace cache: 12K uops, L1 D cache: 16K
> CPU: L2 cache: 2048K
> CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
> Intel machine check architecture supported.
> Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#1.
> CPU1: Intel P4/Xeon Extended MCE MSRs (24) available
> CPU1: Thermal monitoring enabled
> x86 PAT enabled: cpu 1, old 0x7040600070406, new 0x7010600070106
> CPU1: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz stepping 05
> checking TSC synchronization [CPU#0 -> CPU#1]:
> Measured 120 cycles TSC warp between CPUs, turning off TSC clock.
> Marking TSC unstable due to check_tsc_sync_source failed
> APIC error on CPU1: 00(40)
> Clockevents: could not switch to one-shot mode:<7>APIC error on CPU1: 40(40)
>  lapic is not functional.
> Could not switch to high resolution mode on CPU 0
> Clockevents: could not switch to one-shot mode: lapic is not functional.
> Could not switch to high resolution mode on CPU 1
> APIC error on CPU1: 40(40)
> [sched domains messages
> WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU1
> APIC error on CPU1: 40(40)
> [repeat last message 9 times]
> 
> Then follows this pattern indefinitely:
> 
> WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU1
> APIC error on CPU1: 40(40)
> [repeat last message 9 times]
> 
> That's basically the same thing as I saw with suspend. So it can be
> reproduced easily with CPU hotplug.

Well, I don't know who's the right person to ask about the CPU hotplug.
Andrew, can you help please?

Rafael

  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-18 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-18 20:32 Vegard Nossum
2008-08-18 20:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-08-18 21:08   ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-18 21:15     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2008-08-18 21:29       ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-19  1:13 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-19  7:12   ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-19  9:49     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-19 12:12       ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-19 12:37         ` Robert Richter
2008-08-19 12:56         ` Johannes Weiner
2008-08-19 13:18           ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-19 13:18         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-01 16:34   ` Robert Richter
2008-09-05 17:58     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-05 18:59       ` Robert Richter
2008-09-05 20:31         ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200808182316.00854.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=phil.el@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®