From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754519AbYHSLIi (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 07:08:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750862AbYHSLI2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 07:08:28 -0400 Received: from smtp112.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.84.65]:37743 "HELO smtp112.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751602AbYHSLI1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 07:08:27 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=NZXnQCyRVxyOeGTbRnQGVjP5rILvfNrnTfjAq3eV49+R1UttS9XBKy43MGNOgmUhLRQxo6pzhg+Mj35ZRhvbzK60G6Oc+Gb8OyV5/vRYw6HC9b+pvBMiPavJ8FYYN1CKmiwYSdm0tKqUWFmF0LtCcOaNnWBKsy5JbmquBw52bIA= ; X-YMail-OSG: fd6mJecVM1lJLM3Z0YEFRCfNpebv4_ueiDHbTGKsbVFqJMSy8vscLE9tnto1ubCWvEGgm07k5yEEjYoCKHmDfP3Vw_1QvSths.QHm9xqrO40BTuoPCW2XoVtIGjMOdqwtMh0X1JG4dw.y6TLkYL30WCB X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: Nick Piggin To: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 9] x86/smp function calls: convert x86 tlb flushes to use function calls [POST 2] Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:08:13 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , LKML , x86@kernel.org, Andi Kleen , Jens Axboe References: <200808191956.59898.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <20080819102045.GC6722@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20080819102045.GC6722@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808192108.13338.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 19 August 2008 20:20, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Nick Piggin wrote: > > I'm especially sore about mmap because I have a customer with a > > database that uses a lot of mmap/munmap and those calls have slowed > > down something like 50%(!!) from 2.6.early to 2.6.late. > > oh, agreed that it all needs to speed up - please send testcases ... I'm not sure if I can send the testcase I have. But this issue is coming to the top of my list to investigate in mainline, so I'll check out how we're doing here soon.