From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756202AbYHTVRi (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:17:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752426AbYHTVR1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:17:27 -0400 Received: from rrcs-70-62-214-221.central.biz.rr.com ([70.62.214.221]:34271 "EHLO tophat.atxconsulting.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752048AbYHTVR0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:17:26 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:17:24 -0400 From: Timothy J Fontaine To: =?us-ascii?B?PT9JU08tODg1OS0xP1E/SWxwb19KPUU0cnZpbmVuXw==?= , ?=@tophat.atxconsulting.com Cc: Netdev , LKML Subject: Re: r8169 MTU greater than 1500 causes corruption for other controllers Message-ID: <20080820211724.GA4100@tophat.atxconsulting.com> References: <20080820170951.GA1771@tophat.atxconsulting.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: http://atxconsulting.com/tjfontaine.atxconsulting.asc X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: 7937 DFD2 AB06 298B 2293 C318 7D33 FF9D 0246 406D User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:21:11PM +0300, =3D?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ilpo_J=3DE4rvine= n_ wrote: > Hmm, there was no explanation why the tp->rx_buf_sz to pkt_size change > was made in that commit (I have no idea whether those sizes have to match= =20 > to other places that use tp->rx_buf_sz)... Below is a patch to revert=20 > that part of the change fully though it could be enough to change just=20 > pci_unmap_single arg (but that would probably need also=20 > rtl8169_mark_to_asic arg to be changed to match pkt_size). >=20 Excellent, with the patch applied transfers over NFS seem to be going smoothly. > > Below you'll find a list of files referenced from REPORTING-BUGS that > > are meant to be helpful, including the lspci and module information, > > they can all be reached from the toplevel directory index >=20 > Thanks for the detailed report btw... :-) Thanks :) I was more than just a little intimidated by my first post to LKML, and I wanted to make sure the first reply to my report wasn't that I didn't have enough info, or that I presented it in the wrong way, or hadn't done enough testing with it. I was also more than prepared to wait weeks for someone to reply, so thanks for the quick return! :D tjfontaine --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkisieQACgkQfTP/nQJGQG0HsQCg0kuDXCRFL8B0dtk1+Y8T4U1V y8gAn2kM8/l3q8iyApo+EPCBRSm4VUhe =MZi0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--