From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heicars2@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
sameske@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [Patch 1/1] [Self Ptrace] System call notification with self_ptrace
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:32:42 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080828123242.GA187@tv-sign.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48B6942E.2050607@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 08/28, Pierre Morel wrote:
>
> Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >On 08/27, Pierre Morel wrote:
> >
> >>Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>On s390 the patch changes handle_signal(), this is not clear to me too.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>The patch clears the trace flags before delivering the signal so
> >>that the signal handler can use system call without bouncing again.
> >>
> >
> >Yes I see. But the signal handler for SIGSYS can fisrt do
> >sys_ptrace(PTRACE_SELF_OFF) (which is filtered out), and then use any
> >other syscall.
> >
> It is right but brings the overhead of a syscall.
Well, this overhead is very small compared to the signal delivery.
> >With this patch PT_SELF is cleared on any signal. This doesn't look
> >right. Let's suppose that another signal comes in parallel with SIGSYS.
> >It is very possible that the handler for that another signal will be
> >called first, this handler can do some syscall which will be "missed".
> >
>
> If the tracing application catches all signals before delivering
> them to the instrumented original handler there is no problem,
> the catching code can reset PTRACE_SELF_ON before calling the
> instrumented application's original handler.
> The instrumented code will then bounce as expected.
Sorry, can't understand the text above :(
OK, let's suppose the application does
ptrace(PTRACE_SELF_ON);
...
syscall();
This "syscall()" above should trigger the handler for SIGSYS.
But what if another signal (with handler) comes in between?
In that case handle_signal() clears PT_SELF/TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE,
this syscall() (or any other) doesn't send SIGSYS.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-28 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-25 7:34 Pierre Morel
2008-08-25 16:33 ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-26 12:33 ` Pierre Morel
2008-08-25 16:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-08-26 14:04 ` Pierre Morel
2008-08-26 16:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-08-27 14:32 ` Pierre Morel
2008-08-27 16:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-08-28 12:03 ` Pierre Morel
2008-08-28 12:32 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2008-08-28 13:24 ` Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080828123242.GA187@tv-sign.ru \
--to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=heicars2@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=sameske@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®