mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: "CHADHA,VINEET" <vineet@ufl.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TLB evaluation for Linux
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 14:39:00 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200809021439.00484.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1942732773.182121220328723728.JavaMail.osg@osgjas04.cns.ufl.edu>

On Tuesday 02 September 2008 14:12, CHADHA,VINEET wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been working to evaluate TLB performance for Linux O/S and
> virtualized workloads(such as Xen) in a Full system simulator(e.g.
> simics). While my evaluation is in nascent stage, I do notice that
> most of the IPIs in multi-core environments cause complete TLB
> Flush.
>
> I want to evaluate cost of TLB shootdown including re-population
> vs. each entry shootdown (invlpg). While a similar study has been
> done in other kernels (e.g. L4 kernel), I am not aware if it has
> been done for Linux O/S.

This is a very interesting area to investigate. Do you have a link to
any of the existing studies?


> Are there hooks or patches to test or evaluate TLB performance.
> Specifically, I would like to know where to make changes in Linux
> kernel to support each entry shootdown.

The main thing I guess is to look at tlb_flush(), called by tlb_flush_mmu
when unmapping user virtual memory, which on x86 is going to call
flush_tlb_mm, which flushes the entire tlb.

It would need a bit of reworking of things in order to store the virtual
address corresponding to each page in the struct mmu_gather, and then
deciding to branch off to do multiple invlpg if you have only a small
number of pages to be flushed. I'd suggest the easiest way to get
something working on x86 would be to modify the asm-generic infrastructure
(ignore other architectures for the time being).

You will also have to rework the IPI flushing scheme so that it can handle
more than one flush_va for invlpg invalidations.

After you get all this done, you could also look at applying similar
heuristics to flush_tlb_range. This one should be much easier at this point,
but it is used in fewer places (eg. mprotect).

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-02  4:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-02  4:12 CHADHA,VINEET
2008-09-02  4:39 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2008-09-02  6:31 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-02 13:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-02 14:36 CHADHA,VINEET
2008-09-02 14:59 CHADHA,VINEET
2008-09-02 15:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-02 16:14 CHADHA,VINEET

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200809021439.00484.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vineet@ufl.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®