From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754888AbYICOU6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:20:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753189AbYICOUv (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:20:51 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.248]:38992 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751691AbYICOUu (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:20:50 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=dtAEYAAq5wHGQwdcZqgyA/0oRO8czi7CIjGMlb0/Jdg14IFu2rv/xcI6PQQY15xw+p L7UeKsBoGo9HnSvYQ/0Vm9PIR4/4P33IHUTBojcJB5d0UdhPj1fvkM7c0SEtFNWzKJc4 AiepikrtqNndahunIb51esRYIgknoAMwsuRkI= Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:20:41 -0400 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Daniel Barkalow , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christopher Desjardins Subject: Re: Lenovo 3000 N100 i8042 problems Message-ID: <20080903101947.ZZRA012@mailhub.coreip.homeip.net> References: <20080902083940.ZZRA012@mailhub.coreip.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 01:50:35PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > I guess we could use System's product name to differentiate between > > Cristopher's and Daniel's boards. Although I must admit it is the very > > first time when I see a box that behaves better with active mux. DOes > > Vista use active mux nowadays? Because if it is not then I bet there is > > (or shortly will be) a BIOS update fixing legacy mode on Daniel's box. > > I guess so, yes. > > On the other hand, this might also be viewed as regression (we made > Daniel's hardware behave worse with recent kernel than it did before), so > I think we still would like to have this fixed. What about the patch > below, adding the match on System's product name, as you suggested? > Thanks. > I agree. Daniel, could you please try the patch to make sure it restores the previous behavior for you and I will push it through. Thanks! -- Dmitry