mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christopher Desjardins <cddesjardins@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Lenovo 3000 N100 i8042 problems
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:26:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080903102047.ZZRA012@mailhub.coreip.homeip.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.1.00.0809021200470.19665@iabervon.org>

On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 12:16:15PM -0400, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 11:23:25AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > > 
> > > so the product name both of System and Base Board are different, and 
> > > apparently the systems differ. Dmitry, what fields would you propose to be 
> > > put in the DMI matching here? I will do the patch then.
> > > 
> > 
> > I guess we could use System's product name to differentiate between
> > Cristopher's and Daniel's boards. Although I must admit it is the very
> > first time when I see a box that behaves better with active mux. DOes
> > Vista use active mux nowadays? Because if it is not then I bet there
> > is (or shortly will be) a BIOS update fixing legacy mode on Daniel's
> > box.
> 
> Mine's actually old (came with XP). It's still got the original BIOS 
> (because I haven't found a way to upgrade the BIOS without reformatting my 
> hard drive to include Windows), and I remember there being an upgrade 
> available, but I don't think it had anything to do with keyboard/trackpad 
> stuff.
> 
> In what way does active mux usually behave badly? It's possible that 

It usually manifests with a touchpad/mouse missing because they don't
responf to kernel's queries. Quite a few Fujitsus exibit this
behavior.

> legacy mode only has a bug that doesn't matter to Windows, and active mux 
> may have some of the usual problems but nothing I particularly noticed.
> 
> I noticed that, when my i8042 would stop working, it would generally have 
> just delivered one mouse interrupt to CPU1 after never previously doing 
> so. Perhaps there's some sort of deadlock in the Linux i8042 driver when 
> both cores are unexpectedly getting interrupts from the two devices at 
> once? I could understand there being a Linux bug only triggered by quirky 
> hardware that only applies to legacy mode, which was just uncovered by 
> this patch.
>

I am not sure, internally we the kernel still deals with 2 interrupt
sources (KBD and AUX) regardless whether it is in legacy or active
multiplexing mode...

Does it take long to trigger the bug? You coudl try doing "echo 1 >
/sys/modules/i8042/parameters/debug" and thend me dmesg or
/var/log/messages after the bug was triggered - I might see something
there. But please be aware that if you send me such a log I can decode
everything that you have been typing...

-- 
Dmitry

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-03 14:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-01 21:46 Daniel Barkalow
2008-09-01 23:29 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-09-02  0:23   ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-09-02  9:23     ` Jiri Kosina
2008-09-02 12:43       ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-02 12:51         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-09-02 12:43       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-09-02 16:16         ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-09-03 14:26           ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2008-09-03 17:16             ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-09-03 19:06               ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-09-03 20:03                 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-09-05  0:05               ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-09-05  0:46                 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-09-05  3:27                   ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-09-03 11:50         ` Jiri Kosina
2008-09-03 14:20           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-09-03 17:18             ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-09-03 19:07               ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-09-04 23:57               ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-09-03 21:32             ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-03 21:36               ` Jiri Kosina
2008-09-03 22:03               ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-09-08 19:41               ` Renato S. Yamane
2008-09-08 19:55                 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-09-09  3:35                   ` Renato S. Yamane
2008-09-09  3:42                     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-09 13:37                       ` Renato S. Yamane
2008-09-08 20:24                 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080903102047.ZZRA012@mailhub.coreip.homeip.net \
    --to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=barkalow@iabervon.org \
    --cc=cddesjardins@gmail.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®