From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christopher Desjardins <cddesjardins@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Lenovo 3000 N100 i8042 problems
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:26:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080903102047.ZZRA012@mailhub.coreip.homeip.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.1.00.0809021200470.19665@iabervon.org>
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 12:16:15PM -0400, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 11:23:25AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > >
> > > so the product name both of System and Base Board are different, and
> > > apparently the systems differ. Dmitry, what fields would you propose to be
> > > put in the DMI matching here? I will do the patch then.
> > >
> >
> > I guess we could use System's product name to differentiate between
> > Cristopher's and Daniel's boards. Although I must admit it is the very
> > first time when I see a box that behaves better with active mux. DOes
> > Vista use active mux nowadays? Because if it is not then I bet there
> > is (or shortly will be) a BIOS update fixing legacy mode on Daniel's
> > box.
>
> Mine's actually old (came with XP). It's still got the original BIOS
> (because I haven't found a way to upgrade the BIOS without reformatting my
> hard drive to include Windows), and I remember there being an upgrade
> available, but I don't think it had anything to do with keyboard/trackpad
> stuff.
>
> In what way does active mux usually behave badly? It's possible that
It usually manifests with a touchpad/mouse missing because they don't
responf to kernel's queries. Quite a few Fujitsus exibit this
behavior.
> legacy mode only has a bug that doesn't matter to Windows, and active mux
> may have some of the usual problems but nothing I particularly noticed.
>
> I noticed that, when my i8042 would stop working, it would generally have
> just delivered one mouse interrupt to CPU1 after never previously doing
> so. Perhaps there's some sort of deadlock in the Linux i8042 driver when
> both cores are unexpectedly getting interrupts from the two devices at
> once? I could understand there being a Linux bug only triggered by quirky
> hardware that only applies to legacy mode, which was just uncovered by
> this patch.
>
I am not sure, internally we the kernel still deals with 2 interrupt
sources (KBD and AUX) regardless whether it is in legacy or active
multiplexing mode...
Does it take long to trigger the bug? You coudl try doing "echo 1 >
/sys/modules/i8042/parameters/debug" and thend me dmesg or
/var/log/messages after the bug was triggered - I might see something
there. But please be aware that if you send me such a log I can decode
everything that you have been typing...
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-03 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-01 21:46 Daniel Barkalow
2008-09-01 23:29 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-09-02 0:23 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-09-02 9:23 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-09-02 12:43 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-02 12:51 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-09-02 12:43 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-09-02 16:16 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-09-03 14:26 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2008-09-03 17:16 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-09-03 19:06 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-09-03 20:03 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-09-05 0:05 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-09-05 0:46 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-09-05 3:27 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-09-03 11:50 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-09-03 14:20 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-09-03 17:18 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-09-03 19:07 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-09-04 23:57 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-09-03 21:32 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-03 21:36 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-09-03 22:03 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-09-08 19:41 ` Renato S. Yamane
2008-09-08 19:55 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-09-09 3:35 ` Renato S. Yamane
2008-09-09 3:42 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-09 13:37 ` Renato S. Yamane
2008-09-08 20:24 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080903102047.ZZRA012@mailhub.coreip.homeip.net \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=barkalow@iabervon.org \
--cc=cddesjardins@gmail.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®