From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756929AbYIDJU7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2008 05:20:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754304AbYIDJUv (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2008 05:20:51 -0400 Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:41368 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752540AbYIDJUu (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2008 05:20:50 -0400 Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 10:19:36 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Andrew Morton Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Yinghai Lu , Linus Torvalds , David Woodhouse Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for September 3 Message-ID: <20080904101936.086513fc@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20080904001558.875f58b1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080903191619.6b6b230e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080903214634.ea17ff53.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080903215455.792c78a3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080904145744.3f791ca7.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080903220546.bd673658.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080904152015.3145b06e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080903230129.806d54af.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080904001558.875f58b1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 00:15:58 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 23:01:29 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > > > I'll see if I cen reproduce the bug I'm > > actually tring to find with E100=n. > > OK, this regression[*] bisects down to Your first serious looking error: "Module 'acpi' failed to be added to sysfs, error number -17 The system will be unstable now." is not even connected to this area of the code. and I can't find any meaningful description of your regression to attempt to duplicate it on a cleaner tree without it already saying "I'm unstable"