From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753884AbYIENdZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2008 09:33:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753043AbYIENdR (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2008 09:33:17 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:34520 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752956AbYIENdQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2008 09:33:16 -0400 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 06:33:17 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Bernd Schubert Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: frame unwinder patches Message-ID: <20080905063317.5e3a2b2c@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <200809051119.21699.bs@q-leap.de> References: <20080904102936.28e10c39@infradead.org> <200809051119.21699.bs@q-leap.de> Organization: Intel X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by casper.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 11:19:21 +0200 Bernd Schubert wrote: > > not printing the ? would be trivial (for some backtraces we do > > that), but so far hasn't been seen as desirable because you lose > > information in those hard-to-debug cases when you need anything you > > can get from the backtrace. > > I see your point, but in most cases it is rather annoying. ... if you see backtraces regularly there's something wrong ;-) (and if you really care it's 1 line of code to turn it off) -- If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org