From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756981AbYIISj5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:39:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753944AbYIISjt (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:39:49 -0400 Received: from outbound-mail-149.bluehost.com ([67.222.38.39]:49544 "HELO outbound-mail-149.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753954AbYIISjt (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:39:49 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id:X-Identified-User; b=XA2vRqtmcfLflWkiLHb0xB+JxRwGQGCCASo1qievdORC2ikXaoEkpzca9iCGwl/0dbQSSoB9LjoAxtQ/cpOWgmZtwKcgFNgh/UoUhNT1c/RMR556i/APQ4ozIvhCrNoL; From: Jesse Barnes To: David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [2.6.27 PATCH] Blacklist DMAR on Intel G31/G33 chipsets Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 11:39:35 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andi@firstfloor.org, arjan@infradead.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, Ingo Molnar References: <1220439231.2985.103.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20080905183459.GC14258@elte.hu> <1220801726.2985.450.camel@pmac.infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <1220801726.2985.450.camel@pmac.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200809091139.35503.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> X-Identified-User: {642:box128.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 131.252.210.190 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday, September 07, 2008 8:35 am David Woodhouse wrote: > Some BIOSes (the Intel DG33BU, for example) wrongly claim to have DMAR > when they don't. Avoid the resulting crashes when it doesn't work as > expected. Applied. I'll include it in my next 2.6.27 pull request after fixing up my trees. Thanks, Jesse