From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754215AbYIJMC4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:02:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751856AbYIJMCs (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:02:48 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:46715 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751453AbYIJMCr (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:02:47 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:02:31 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: "Yang, Sheng" Cc: Yinghai Lu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity , Andi Kleen , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: Extended cpuinfo to show virtualization HW features Message-ID: <20080910120231.GB4970@elte.hu> References: <12209432941440-git-send-email-sheng.yang@intel.com> <86802c440809091045h2d4f1776g94355e1b1dd1b29e@mail.gmail.com> <20080910080421.GC15255@elte.hu> <200809101842.31355.sheng.yang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200809101842.31355.sheng.yang@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Yang, Sheng wrote: > On Wednesday 10 September 2008 16:04:21 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Yinghai Lu wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:05 AM, Yang, Sheng wrote: > > > > Yeah, I've considered that, but seems duplicate for both files? The > > > > feature detection code is the same. Any way to merge them? > > > > > > just merged intel_64.c into intel.c... > > > > it's all in tip/master: > > > > http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README > > > > would it be possible to get a patchset ontop of that? > > > > Ingo > > So quick.... hey, wasting time is something we really suck at ;-) > Thanks Yinghai! > > Would send the updated patch soon. got it, thanks. I've applied patch #1 and updated patch #2 to the tip/x86/unify-cpu-detect topic tree: e38e05a: x86: extended "flags" to show virtualization HW feature in /proc/cpuinfo 315a655: x86: move VMX MSRs to msr-index.h Ingo