From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756518AbYIKXsR (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:48:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753779AbYIKXsB (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:48:01 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:60887 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751810AbYIKXsA (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:48:00 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:47:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20080911.164754.205344391.davem@davemloft.net> To: elad_lahav@users.sourceforge.net Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Initial support for Niagara T1 performance counters From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <48C9AB16.3060706@users.sourceforge.net> References: <48C98820.3080009@users.sourceforge.net> <20080911.145937.178601244.davem@davemloft.net> <48C9AB16.3060706@users.sourceforge.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.1 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Elad Lahav Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:34:46 -0400 > Just for the record, is the implementation correct? Specifically, is > this the right way to extract the PIL at the time of the trap? Yep it looks right. Also, for the record, you should post sparc patches at least CC:'d to sparclinux@vger.kernel.org in the future.