From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755184AbYINPZj (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Sep 2008 11:25:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753551AbYINPZb (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Sep 2008 11:25:31 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:56610 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753137AbYINPZa (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Sep 2008 11:25:30 -0400 Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:25:13 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Alex Nixon , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] redefine resource_size_t as phys_addr_t Message-ID: <20080914152512.GG29290@elte.hu> References: <48C8D776.1020204@goop.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48C8D776.1020204@goop.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.1 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.1 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.1 BAYES_05 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 1 to 5% [score: 0.0102] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > There's no good reason why a resource_size_t shouldn't just be a > physical address, so simply redefine it in terms of phys_addr_t. i've applied your patchset to tip/core/resources: 8308c54: generic: redefine resource_size_t as phys_addr_t 947d049: generic: make PFN_PHYS explicitly return phys_addr_t 600715d: generic: add phys_addr_t for holding physical addresses thanks, Ingo