From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754936AbYIOAee (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Sep 2008 20:34:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753375AbYIOAeY (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Sep 2008 20:34:24 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:51075 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751777AbYIOAeY (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Sep 2008 20:34:24 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: "Steven Noonan" Subject: Re: frustrating ath9k issues in 2.6.27-rc6-00036-ga551b98 (Linus pristine tree) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 02:39:05 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: LKML References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200809150239.05729.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday, 13 of September 2008, Steven Noonan wrote: > I just had another incident where it disassociated and refused to > reassociate. I got about 100 of these in my dmesg (fixed by unloading > and reloading ath9k): Is this a regression from 2.6.26? Rafael