From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754332AbYIOEdY (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:33:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751123AbYIOEdS (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:33:18 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:51538 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751118AbYIOEdR (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:33:17 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Steven Noonan Subject: Re: frustrating ath9k issues in 2.6.27-rc6-00036-ga551b98 (Linus pristine tree) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 06:38:10 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: LKML References: <200809150239.05729.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200809150638.10771.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, 15 of September 2008, Steven Noonan wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Sep 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Saturday, 13 of September 2008, Steven Noonan wrote: > > > I just had another incident where it disassociated and refused to > > > reassociate. I got about 100 of these in my dmesg (fixed by unloading > > > and reloading ath9k): > > > > Is this a regression from 2.6.26? > > > > ath9k has been recently introduced (i.e. it's new to 2.6.27). So I'm not > certain how to answer. Correct me if I'm wrong but a regression is a new > bug for a specific component that did not surface in the previous release, > correct? Yes. > But if the component didn't exist in the previous version, is it still a > regression? No, it isn't considered as a regression. Thanks, Rafael