From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754879AbYIOHR6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:17:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752146AbYIOHRt (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:17:49 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:35837 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751665AbYIOHRs (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:17:48 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:17:32 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Steven Noonan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH] FTRACE_STARTUP_TEST should depend on FTRACE. Message-ID: <20080915071732.GA24442@elte.hu> References: <1221436952-15206-1-git-send-email-steven@uplinklabs.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1221436952-15206-1-git-send-email-steven@uplinklabs.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0051] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Steven Noonan wrote: > Doesn't make sense to do an FTRACE startup test when FTRACE isn't even > being compiled in. hm, not sure - there is a bit of a dual personality here: 'ftrace' also means the 'function tracer', which is one of the tracers implemented in kernel/trace/*. The correct dependency is on CONFIG_TRACING - and CONFIG_FTRACE_STARTUP_TEST already depends on that. Ingo