From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: smpboot - check if we have ESR register in wakeup_secondary_cpu
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:20:07 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080915102007.GB7131@lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080915100119.GA7131@lenovo>
[Cyrill Gorcunov - Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 02:01:19PM +0400]
| [Ingo Molnar - Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 09:56:55AM +0200]
| |
| | * Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
| |
| | > We should check if we have ESR register before writting to it.
| | >
| | > Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
| | > ---
| | >
| | > Please review!
| | > it seems the same nit in do_boot_cpu - checking now.
| | >
| | > Index: linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
| | > ===================================================================
| | > --- linux-2.6.git.orig/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c 2008-09-14 19:43:03.000000000 +0400
| | > +++ linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c 2008-09-14 21:49:36.000000000 +0400
| | > @@ -598,10 +598,12 @@ wakeup_secondary_cpu(int logical_apicid,
| | > * Give the other CPU some time to accept the IPI.
| | > */
| | > udelay(200);
| | > - maxlvt = lapic_get_maxlvt();
| | > - if (maxlvt > 3) /* Due to the Pentium erratum 3AP. */
| | > - apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0);
| | > - accept_status = (apic_read(APIC_ESR) & 0xEF);
| | > + if (APIC_INTEGRATED(apic_version[phys_apicid])) {
| | > + maxlvt = lapic_get_maxlvt();
| | > + if (maxlvt > 3) /* Due to the Pentium erratum 3AP. */
| | > + apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0);
| | > + accept_status = (apic_read(APIC_ESR) & 0xEF);
| | > + }
| | > pr_debug("NMI sent.\n");
| |
| | hm, is there any non-integrated lapic that has more than 3 lvts? iirc
| | lvts were introduced with the integrated lapic.
| |
| | Ingo
| |
|
| Yes Ingo, but don't forget the next line in former
|
| accept_status = (apic_read(APIC_ESR) & 0xEF);
|
| so we're protected in writting but _not_ in reading - which
| is buggy a bit :-)
|
| - Cyrill -
Ingo - could you replace in this patch message and subject -
writting to reading - it will be more correct.
- Cyrill -
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-15 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-14 17:58 Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-15 7:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-15 10:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-15 10:20 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2008-09-15 14:02 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080915102007.GB7131@lenovo \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®