From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
manfred@colorfullife.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] rcu: introduce kfree_rcu()
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:15:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080918171542.GC6605@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48D21875.7030605@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 04:59:33PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
[ . . . ]
> 1) unloadable modules:
> A) use my_struct_release_rcu():
> when we unload this modules, we need call rcu_barrier() to wait
> all my_struct_release_rcu() had called.
> B) use kfree_rcu():
> if all trivial callback are removed and kfree_rcu() are used instead,
> we do not need to wait anything. just quick finish unloading.
OK, so the trick is that the module -never- uses call_rcu()
directly, instead using -only- kfree_rcu(), along perhaps also with
synchronize_rcu(). Because kfree_rcu() does not reference module text,
you then don't need to wait at all. Good point!
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-18 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-18 4:18 Lai Jiangshan
2008-09-18 4:37 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-18 16:52 ` Manfred Spraul
2008-09-19 2:31 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-09-18 6:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-09-18 8:59 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-09-18 17:15 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2008-09-18 16:56 ` Manfred Spraul
2008-09-18 17:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-09-19 16:03 ` Manfred Spraul
2008-09-19 1:04 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-09-19 3:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080918171542.GC6605@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome