From: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>
To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
dm-devel@redhat.com, j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com,
k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: exports busy status via bdi_lld_congested
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:49:22 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080919.104922.97297160.k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080919.104756.41628866.k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>
This patch change scsi mid layer to export its busy status.
Not set the busy flag, when scsi can't dispatch I/Os anymore and
needs to kill I/Os. Otherwise, request stacking drivers may hold
requests forever.
Signed-off-by: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi.c | 4 ++--
drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: scsi-misc-2.6/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
===================================================================
--- scsi-misc-2.6.orig/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ scsi-misc-2.6/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -459,17 +459,30 @@ static void scsi_init_cmd_errh(struct sc
void scsi_device_unbusy(struct scsi_device *sdev)
{
+ int host_congested;
struct Scsi_Host *shost = sdev->host;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
shost->host_busy--;
+ if ((shost->can_queue > 0 && shost->host_busy >= shost->can_queue) ||
+ shost->host_blocked || shost->host_self_blocked ||
+ scsi_host_in_recovery(shost))
+ host_congested = 1;
+ else
+ host_congested = 0;
+
if (unlikely(scsi_host_in_recovery(shost) &&
(shost->host_failed || shost->host_eh_scheduled)))
scsi_eh_wakeup(shost);
spin_unlock(shost->host_lock);
+
spin_lock(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock);
sdev->device_busy--;
+ if (bdi_lld_congested(&sdev->request_queue->backing_dev_info) &&
+ !host_congested && sdev->device_busy < sdev->queue_depth &&
+ !sdev->device_blocked)
+ clear_bdi_lld_congested(&sdev->request_queue->backing_dev_info);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock, flags);
}
@@ -1496,9 +1509,14 @@ static void scsi_request_fn(struct reque
* accept it.
*/
req = elv_next_request(q);
- if (!req || !scsi_dev_queue_ready(q, sdev))
+ if (!req)
break;
+ if (!scsi_dev_queue_ready(q, sdev)) {
+ set_bdi_lld_congested(&q->backing_dev_info);
+ break;
+ }
+
if (unlikely(!scsi_device_online(sdev))) {
sdev_printk(KERN_ERR, sdev,
"rejecting I/O to offline device\n");
@@ -1569,6 +1587,8 @@ static void scsi_request_fn(struct reque
rtn = scsi_dispatch_cmd(cmd);
spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
if(rtn) {
+ set_bdi_lld_congested(&q->backing_dev_info);
+
/* we're refusing the command; because of
* the way locks get dropped, we need to
* check here if plugging is required */
@@ -1593,6 +1613,7 @@ static void scsi_request_fn(struct reque
* later time.
*/
spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
+ set_bdi_lld_congested(&q->backing_dev_info);
blk_requeue_request(q, req);
sdev->device_busy--;
if(sdev->device_busy == 0)
Index: scsi-misc-2.6/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
===================================================================
--- scsi-misc-2.6.orig/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
+++ scsi-misc-2.6/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
@@ -862,8 +862,6 @@ void scsi_finish_command(struct scsi_cmn
struct scsi_driver *drv;
unsigned int good_bytes;
- scsi_device_unbusy(sdev);
-
/*
* Clear the flags which say that the device/host is no longer
* capable of accepting new commands. These are set in scsi_queue.c
@@ -875,6 +873,8 @@ void scsi_finish_command(struct scsi_cmn
shost->host_blocked = 0;
sdev->device_blocked = 0;
+ scsi_device_unbusy(sdev);
+
/*
* If we have valid sense information, then some kind of recovery
* must have taken place. Make a note of this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-19 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-19 14:47 [PATCH 0/2] Add lld-congestion bit for backing_dev_info Kiyoshi Ueda
2008-09-19 14:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] lld busy status exporting interface Kiyoshi Ueda
2008-09-19 21:33 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-19 23:11 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2008-09-19 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-22 4:49 ` Jun'ichi Nomura (NEC)
2008-09-19 14:49 ` Kiyoshi Ueda [this message]
2008-09-19 16:06 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/2] scsi: exports busy status via bdi_lld_congested Mike Christie
2008-09-19 17:28 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080919.104922.97297160.k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com \
--to=k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®