From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752936AbYITUEx (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Sep 2008 16:04:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751128AbYITUEn (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Sep 2008 16:04:43 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:34257 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751112AbYITUEm (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Sep 2008 16:04:42 -0400 Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 13:04:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20080920.130430.267667082.davem@davemloft.net> To: dwalker@mvista.com Cc: arjan@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com, steffen.klassert@secunet.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure. From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1221936751.1343.226.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1221932404.1343.196.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080920110952.05da49ab@infradead.org> <1221936751.1343.226.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.1 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Daniel Walker Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 11:52:31 -0700 > All that vs. bouncing data around the caches.. To what degree has all > that been handled or thought about? Give concrete things to discuss or just be quiet.