From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753909AbYIVRwj (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:52:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751796AbYIVRw0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:52:26 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:47763 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751095AbYIVRwZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:52:25 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:52:12 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: FUJITA Tomonori Cc: joerg.roedel@amd.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] AMD IOMMU: revert "x86, AMD IOMMU: honor iommu=off instead of amd_iommu=off" Message-ID: <20080922175212.GE10535@elte.hu> References: <20080922142713.GA24392@amd.com> <20080922235421A.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20080922163109.GD24392@amd.com> <20080923020639U.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080923020639U.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -0.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-0.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -0.5 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 5 to 20% [score: 0.0547] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > Sure, Ingo's suggestion looks consistent, but these parameters > interact other parameters. If we are serious about improving the IOMMU > parameters, we need to spend more time to think about the final > picture of all the IOMMU parameters that we need. yeah, definitely. Ingo