From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751891AbYIWLUD (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2008 07:20:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751202AbYIWLTx (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2008 07:19:53 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:56974 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750959AbYIWLTw (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2008 07:19:52 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:19:35 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Glauber Costa Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT-PULL] Split time.c series: part 1 Message-ID: <20080923111935.GK29021@elte.hu> References: <200809221857.m8MIvXUB019029@ns3.rdu.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200809221857.m8MIvXUB019029@ns3.rdu.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Glauber Costa wrote: > Ingo, please pull the latest master branch git tree from: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/glommer/linux-2.6-x86-integration.git ingo-time > > into your tree hm, there's no ingo-time branch there. Forgot to push out? But the 'master' branch seems to match up with your diffstat, so i pulled that one instead. > It contains the part of time.c integration that is considered mostly > safe, and does not touch (but one reorganization patch) the interrupt > code. It should go smootly, but it's (should be) bisection friendly in > case it doesn't. i've restructured the dependencies a bit: i've put your changes into tip/x86/time and based them on tip/x86/core (not tip/master). It integrates cleanly into tip/master and i've started testing them. Thanks, Ingo