mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-netdev@vger.kernel.org, kkeil@suse.de, agospoda@redhat.com,
	arjan@linux.intel.com, david.graham@intel.com,
	bruce.w.allan@intel.com, jkosina@suse.cz, john.ronciak@intel.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, chris.jones@canonical.com,
	tim.gardner@intel.com, airlied@gmail.com,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 09/12] e1000e: dump eeprom to dmesg for ich8/9
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:20:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080930032003.22950.38716.stgit@jbrandeb-bw.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080930030825.22950.18891.stgit@jbrandeb-bw.jf.intel.com>

dumping the eeprom for now seems like a bit of a verbose
hack, but might be useful when we want to restore it.

if syslogd (or something like) isn't running it won't be kept
however.

Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
---

 drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c |    5 +++++
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
index 48b0ded..57cead3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -4598,6 +4598,11 @@ static int __devinit e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
 
 	e1000_eeprom_checks(adapter);
 
+	/* debug code ... dump the first bytes of the eeprom for
+	 * ich parts that might get a corruption */
+	if (adapter->flags & FLAG_IS_ICH)
+		e1000e_dump_eeprom(adapter);
+
 	/* don't block initalization here due to bad MAC address */
 	memcpy(netdev->dev_addr, adapter->hw.mac.addr, netdev->addr_len);
 	memcpy(netdev->perm_addr, adapter->hw.mac.addr, netdev->addr_len);


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-09-30  3:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-30  3:19 [RFC PATCH 00/12] e1000e debug and protection patches Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  3:19 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] x86: export set_memory_ro and set_memory_rw Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  7:07   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-30  3:19 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote: Jesse Brandeburg
2008-10-02 22:23   ` Jesse Barnes
2008-10-03 20:46     ` David Miller
2008-10-03 21:29       ` Jesse Barnes
2008-10-03 21:45         ` Jiri Kosina
2008-10-03 23:28           ` Jesse Brandeburg
2008-10-03 23:30             ` Jesse Brandeburg
2008-10-04 10:21             ` Jiri Kosina
2008-10-04 11:02               ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-05  1:24                 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2008-10-05  8:51                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-05 15:05                     ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-05 15:55                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-05 16:02                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-05 16:16                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-05 17:01                             ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-07 23:19     ` David Miller
2008-09-30  3:19 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] e1000e: reset swflag after resetting hardware Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  3:19 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] e1000e: do not ever sleep in interrupt context Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  3:19 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] e1000e: fix lockdep issues Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  3:19 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] e1000e: drop stats lock Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  3:19 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] e1000e: debug contention on NVM SWFLAG Jesse Brandeburg
2008-10-02 14:28   ` Jiri Kosina
2008-10-02 15:03     ` Olaf Kirch
2008-10-02 16:27       ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-10-02 17:33         ` Olaf Kirch
2008-10-02 18:58           ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-02 19:07             ` Olaf Kirch
2008-10-02 19:08               ` Olaf Kirch
2008-10-02 18:02         ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-02 23:42       ` [PATCH] e1000e: prevent concurrent access to NVRAM Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-03  0:19         ` Jesse Brandeburg
2008-10-03  0:28           ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-30  3:19 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] e1000e: allow bad checksum Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  8:38   ` Jiri Kosina
2008-09-30  3:20 ` Jesse Brandeburg [this message]
2008-09-30  3:20 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] e1000e: Use set_memory_ro()/set_memory_rw() to protect flash memory Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30  3:20 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] e1000e: write protect ICHx NVM to prevent malicious write/erase Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-30 12:40   ` Jiri Kosina
2008-09-30 15:47     ` Allan, Bruce W
2008-10-01 13:29       ` Jiri Kosina
2008-10-01 19:13         ` Allan, Bruce W
2008-09-30  3:20 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] update version Jesse Brandeburg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080930032003.22950.38716.stgit@jbrandeb-bw.jf.intel.com \
    --to=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=agospoda@redhat.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.w.allan@intel.com \
    --cc=chris.jones@canonical.com \
    --cc=david.graham@intel.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
    --cc=kkeil@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.gardner@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®