From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753131AbYI3JMW (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2008 05:12:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751577AbYI3JMO (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2008 05:12:14 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:45356 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751521AbYI3JMN (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2008 05:12:13 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:11:40 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Mike Travis Cc: Rusty Russell , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , David Miller , Yinghai Lu , Thomas Gleixner , Jack Steiner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/31] cpumask: Provide new cpumask API Message-ID: <20080930091140.GB27452@elte.hu> References: <20080929180250.111209000@polaris-admin.engr.sgi.com> <20080929180250.825653000@polaris-admin.engr.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080929180250.825653000@polaris-admin.engr.sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Mike Travis wrote: > /* replaces cpumask_t dst = (cpumask_t)src */ > void cpus_copy(cpumask_t dst, const cpumask_t src); minor namespace nit i noticed while looking at actual usage of cpus_copy(): could you please rename it cpumask_set(dst, src)? That streamlines it to have the same naming concept as atomic_set(), node_set(), zero_fd_set(), etc. the patch-set looks quite nice otherwise already, the changes are straightforward and the end result already looks a lot more maintainable and not fragile at all. In what way will Rusty's changes differ? Since you incorporate some of Rusty's changes already, could you please iterate towards a single patchset which we could then start testing? Ingo