From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753104AbYI3KXr (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2008 06:23:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752377AbYI3KXh (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2008 06:23:37 -0400 Received: from 2-1-3-15a.ens.sth.bostream.se ([82.182.31.214]:33869 "EHLO zoo.weinigel.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752058AbYI3KXh (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2008 06:23:37 -0400 Message-Id: <20080930102313.418263345@zoo.weinigel.se> User-Agent: quilt/0.46-1 Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:23:13 +0200 From: Christer Weinigel To: drzeus-list@drzeus.cx Cc: Christer Weinigel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [patch 0/3] RFC: Low-latency SDIO Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Pierre and anyone else who is interested, Here is a cleaned up patch that implements the low-latency SDIO stuff I mailed about a couple of weeks ago. Basically the patches adds asynchronous SDIO operations and makes it possible to register a "hard" SDIO interrupt handler which will be called directly from interrupt context (mmc_signal_sdio_irq). So, tell me what you think. :-) /Christer -- "Just how much can I get away with and still go to heaven?" Christer Weinigel http://www.weinigel.se