From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753227AbYI3NGU (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:06:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751551AbYI3NGM (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:06:12 -0400 Received: from smtp239.poczta.interia.pl ([217.74.64.239]:33347 "EHLO smtp239.poczta.interia.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751797AbYI3NGL convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:06:11 -0400 Date: 30 Sep 2008 15:06:06 +0200 From: krzysztof.h1@poczta.fm Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: enable CPUID on Cyrix cpus with CPUID disabled To: Ingo Molnar , Krzysztof Helt Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "sfr@canb.auug.org.au" , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Yinghai Lu , Samuel Sieb MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-ORIGINATE-IP: 83.17.101.58 X-Mailer: PSE Message-Id: <20080930130606.66276199B265@f14.poczta.interia.pl> X-EMID: 99d40acc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > * Krzysztof Helt wrote: > > > From: Krzysztof Helt > > > > The macros setCx86_old() and getCx86_old() do not > > work as a comment says in the processor-cyrix.h. > > > > Use working inline functions instead to enable > > the CPUID instriction on Cyrix cpus. > > > > Tested on IBM 6x86MX cpu with disabled the > > CPUID instruction. > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Helt > > --- > > > > This patch is against the linux-next tree (20080819) > > as it contains the following patch: > > > > x86, cyrix: debug > > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar > > > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git;a=commit;h=026e2c05ef58ef413e2d52696f125d5ea1aa8bce > > > > The linux-2.6-tip tree has not the Ingo's patch so it > > does not require my patch. > > > > I am confused. Is the x86 detection code for Cyrix > > cpus is right in the linux-next or in the linux-2.6-tip? > > Should I prepare patches against the linux-2.6-tip > > or linux-next? > > now that the bug is correctly understood and fixed, could you please > send a patch that cleans it all up and gets rid of the setCx86_old() / > setCx86() API distinction? I.e. revert commit 026e2c0 ("x86, cyrix: > debug"). Against tip/master please. > > note that this was all done in connection to: > > commit c6744955d0ec0cb485c28c51eeb7185e260f6172 > Author: Samuel Sieb > Date: Wed Aug 6 22:06:29 2008 -0700 > > x86: fix "kernel won't boot on a Cyrix MediaGXm (Geode)" > I know that it was connected with the Geode booting, but I read the cyrix.c file and most paths are Geode specific and I won't be able to test them. I tested that reverting the commit 026e2c0 ("x86, cyrix: debug") does not break anything on 6x86MX cpu. If the tip/master is a correct tree, please revert the commit 026e2c0 in the linux-next and drop this patch. This way everything is correct. Regards, Krzysztof ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Dzwon taniej na zagraniczne komorki! Sprawdz >> http://link.interia.pl/f1f26