From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl
Cc: dada1@cosmosbay.com, minyard@acm.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
shemminger@vyatta.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Convert the UDP hash lock to RCU
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:29:31 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081007.112931.144606424.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1223368290.26330.10.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:31:30 +0200
> On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 14:40 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
> > Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 23:22:31 +0200
> >
> > > Me wondering what impact this synchronize_rcu() can have on mono-threaded
> > > VOIP applications using lot of UDP sockets. What is the maximum delay of
> > > this function ?
> >
> > The cost is enormous, we really can't use it here.
> >
> > I have a patch that did top-level socket destruction using RCU,
> > and that didn't use synchronize_rcu(), and that killed connection
> > rates by up to %20.
>
> Did you ever figure out why you lost those 20% ?
Probably the RCU delay on a 128 cpu machine :-)
Also I bet batching the socket destruction eliminates all of
the cached local state we have in the cpu at the actual socket
destruction time.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-07 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-06 18:50 Corey Minyard
2008-10-06 21:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-10-06 21:40 ` David Miller
2008-10-06 23:08 ` Corey Minyard
2008-10-07 8:37 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-10-07 14:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-07 14:29 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-10-07 14:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-07 14:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-07 14:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-07 15:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-10-07 15:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-07 5:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-10-07 8:54 ` Benny Amorsen
2008-10-07 12:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-10-07 14:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-10-07 20:55 ` David Miller
2008-10-07 21:20 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-10-08 13:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-10-08 18:45 ` David Miller
2008-10-07 16:43 ` Corey Minyard
2008-10-07 18:26 ` David Miller
2008-10-08 8:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-10-08 16:38 ` David Miller
2008-10-07 8:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-07 14:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-07 18:29 ` David Miller [this message]
2008-10-06 22:07 ` Corey Minyard
2008-10-07 8:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-07 9:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-10-07 14:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-07 14:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-07 14:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-10-07 15:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-07 15:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-07 15:23 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081007.112931.144606424.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minyard@acm.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome