mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: "Steven Noonan" <steven@uplinklabs.net>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"Steve French" <sfrench@us.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cifs: fix build on !CONFIG_KEYS
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 07:30:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081012073037.20d399ee@tleilax.poochiereds.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200810121330.49028.rjw@sisk.pl>

On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 13:30:48 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:

> On Sunday, 12 of October 2008, Steven Noonan wrote:
> > Hmm, which fix is correct though? Depending on KEYS in Kconfig, or
> > adding a nop for it?
> 
> Well, according to git-blame the key_revoke() has been added to fs/cifs/sess.c
> only recently while key_put() was there before.  For this reason I think it's
> correct to handle key_revoke() in analogy with key_put(), ie. add an empty
> definition for it if CONFIG_KEYS is unset.
> 
> Thanks,
> Rafael
> 

Agreed. It should be possible to build CIFS w/o KEYS support. Adding an empty
key_revoke looks like the right thing to do. Looks like Adrian Bunk sent a
patch for this a few hours ago:

    Subject: [2.6 patch] add key_revoke() dummy for KEYS=n

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>

      reply	other threads:[~2008-10-12 11:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-12 11:09 Ingo Molnar
2008-10-12 11:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-12 11:14   ` Steven Noonan
2008-10-12 11:15     ` Steven Noonan
2008-10-12 11:30       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-12 11:30         ` Jeff Layton [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081012073037.20d399ee@tleilax.poochiereds.net \
    --to=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=sfrench@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=steven@uplinklabs.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®