From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755901AbYJMHfS (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Oct 2008 03:35:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753502AbYJMHfG (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Oct 2008 03:35:06 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:57829 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753247AbYJMHfF (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Oct 2008 03:35:05 -0400 Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:34:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20081013.003441.109866647.davem@davemloft.net> To: swivel@shells.gnugeneration.com Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Honoring SO_RCVLOWAT in proto_ops.poll methods From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20081005.153059.111120997.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20081005.132722.203253085.davem@davemloft.net> <20081005214556.GL18569@fc6222126.aspadmin.net> <20081005.153059.111120997.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.1 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: David Miller Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2008 15:30:59 -0700 (PDT) > From: swivel@shells.gnugeneration.com > Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 16:45:57 -0500 > > > I will be testing this patch today. At a glance it appears with this > > patch we're still not taking rcvlowat into consideration in recv() > > with MSG_PEEK flag set. This should probably also be corrected, as > > mentioned in the thread previously. > > Yes, I remember you mentioning that. > > I'll look into it. Were you able to test my updated patch? If it makes your application work, I might want to defer messing around with MSG_PEEK semantics in recvmsg(). So I've been waiting for your test results before I proceed.