From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753126AbYJTE0n (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:26:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752096AbYJTE0X (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:26:23 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:51388 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752070AbYJTE0W (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:26:22 -0400 Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:25:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20081019.212559.193693268.davem@davemloft.net> To: swivel@shells.gnugeneration.com Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Honoring SO_RCVLOWAT in proto_ops.poll methods From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20081020035819.GG2811@fc6222126.aspadmin.net> References: <20081013083214.GN2811@fc6222126.aspadmin.net> <20081013.025816.197282812.davem@davemloft.net> <20081020035819.GG2811@fc6222126.aspadmin.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.1 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: swivel@shells.gnugeneration.com Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 22:58:19 -0500 > From what I can see the recv() MSG_PEEK fix is trivial anyways, why not > fix it? Patches welcome :-) I'm just very busy and that's the only reason I haven't tackled it myself.