From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@zoy.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS 5-minute hangs upon S3 resume using 2.6.27 client
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:15:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200810230015.20493.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081022212934.GA24143@zoy.org>
On Wednesday, 22 of October 2008, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> This has been mentionned in bugzilla already, but I'd like to draw attention
> before it gets too late for 2.6.28.
I'm afraid it already is too late.
> The following is a common cause of 5-minute NFS hangs here:
>
> * Client has TCP connections to the NFS server, goes to S3 sleep for few hours.
> * TCP connections die on the server side.
> (not 100% sure why, do they use some kind of keepalive ???)
> * Client resumes from S3.
> * Client sends NFS requests down its TCP connections, gets back RST packet.
> * [Client hangs for exactly 300 seconds here]
> * Client establishes new TCP connections to the NFS server,
> and recovers from the hang.
>
> A tcpdump trace is attached at the end of bugzilla bug 11154:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11154
>
> Should the client immediately try to reconnect when its existing connection
> receives an RST packet ? (the 5 minute delay would make sense to me if
> RST was received in reply to a SYN, but I'm not sure about it in the case
> of an existing open TCP connection).
>
> If the 5 minute delay after an RST is necessary, could the client avoid it
> by explicitly closing/reopening its connections using suspend/resume hooks ?
>
> (I can not work around the issue locally by mounting/unmounting my NFS
> shares around the suspend/resume because rootfs also on NFS...)
>
> This NFS setup was working fine in 2.6.24. There has been issues with
> 2.6.25 and 2.6.26, but I did not confirm if they are the same bug.
> 2.6.25 usualy recovers after some variable delay and 2.6.26 usualy
> does not recover. Bugs 11154 and 11061 have more details about this,
> also Ian Campbell has been tracking an NFS issue under load that
> appeared at around the same time.
>
> Hope this helps,
Thanks for the info, but I'm not a networking expert.
You should have CCed the NFS people, but it looks like they already know.
Thanks,
Rafael
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-22 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-22 21:29 Michel Lespinasse
2008-10-22 22:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200810230015.20493.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=walken@zoy.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®