mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@zoy.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS 5-minute hangs upon S3 resume using 2.6.27 client
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:15:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200810230015.20493.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081022212934.GA24143@zoy.org>

On Wednesday, 22 of October 2008, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> Hi,

Hi,

> This has been mentionned in bugzilla already, but I'd like to draw attention
> before it gets too late for 2.6.28.

I'm afraid it already is too late.

> The following is a common cause of 5-minute NFS hangs here:
> 
> * Client has TCP connections to the NFS server, goes to S3 sleep for few hours.
> * TCP connections die on the server side.
>   (not 100% sure why, do they use some kind of keepalive ???)
> * Client resumes from S3.
> * Client sends NFS requests down its TCP connections, gets back RST packet.
> * [Client hangs for exactly 300 seconds here]
> * Client establishes new TCP connections to the NFS server,
>   and recovers from the hang.
> 
> A tcpdump trace is attached at the end of bugzilla bug 11154:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11154
> 
> Should the client immediately try to reconnect when its existing connection
> receives an RST packet ? (the 5 minute delay would make sense to me if
> RST was received in reply to a SYN, but I'm not sure about it in the case
> of an existing open TCP connection).
> 
> If the 5 minute delay after an RST is necessary, could the client avoid it
> by explicitly closing/reopening its connections using suspend/resume hooks ?
> 
> (I can not work around the issue locally by mounting/unmounting my NFS
> shares around the suspend/resume because rootfs also on NFS...)
> 
> This NFS setup was working fine in 2.6.24. There has been issues with
> 2.6.25 and 2.6.26, but I did not confirm if they are the same bug.
> 2.6.25 usualy recovers after some variable delay and 2.6.26 usualy
> does not recover. Bugs 11154 and 11061 have more details about this,
> also Ian Campbell has been tracking an NFS issue under load that
> appeared at around the same time.
> 
> Hope this helps,

Thanks for the info, but I'm not a networking expert.

You should have CCed the NFS people, but it looks like they already know.

Thanks,
Rafael

      reply	other threads:[~2008-10-22 22:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-22 21:29 Michel Lespinasse
2008-10-22 22:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200810230015.20493.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=walken@zoy.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®