From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757445AbYJWRw7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:52:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752590AbYJWRwv (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:52:51 -0400 Received: from outbound-mail-109.bluehost.com ([69.89.22.9]:53449 "HELO outbound-mail-109.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752457AbYJWRwu (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:52:50 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id:X-Identified-User; b=uHZ96eS2RH3jtYlwOR08w1CDwBt4C7vhxvN3+Fu9hMm5xU1i82h/Hgmyneq9L+zRlSkNeYRl7W3Pz0TN6nHtHzOkjV5VMrcBFnnwjf609gzL2b4WKeNk2rFCxiOZcqAX; From: Jesse Barnes To: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [git pull] PCI pull request #2 for 2.6.28 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:52:47 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.1 (Linux/2.6.26.5-45.fc9.x86_64; KDE/4.1.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Linux Kernel Development , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org References: <200810221714.18723.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810231052.47621.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> X-Identified-User: {642:box128.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 75.111.27.49 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, October 23, 2008 10:46 am Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > A few more bits for 2.6.28, mainly hotplug related stuff so the risk > > should be pretty low. There are a few good fixes in here though too: a > > build fix for some architectures due to the new ioremap_nocache usage in > > pci.h and a fix for a refcounting bug. > > Pulled. > > Ingo tells me that the ARI code is broken on his Nehalem, and that there's > already a confirmed fix for it by Yu Zhao ("[PATCH] pci: fix ARI") but > it's not in this series. > > Hmm? Status? Yeah came in after I set up my pull request; I'll queue it up today. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center