From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756659AbYJWQff (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:35:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755728AbYJWQfY (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:35:24 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:49982 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756067AbYJWQfX (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:35:23 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:35:08 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Mike Travis Cc: Rusty Russell , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [bug #2] Re: [PATCH 00/35] cpumask: Replace cpumask_t with struct cpumask Message-ID: <20081023163508.GA15921@elte.hu> References: <20081023020826.051012000@polaris-admin.engr.sgi.com> <20081023125529.GA18327@elte.hu> <20081023142025.GA18804@elte.hu> <200810240201.15037.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <20081023160610.GA8853@elte.hu> <4900A3C6.1080000@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4900A3C6.1080000@sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE RBL: Envelope sender in blackholes.securitysage.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Mike Travis wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Rusty Russell wrote: > > > >> On Friday 24 October 2008 01:20:25 Ingo Molnar wrote: > >>> Thomas has started a -tip cross-build test, and there's massive > >>> cross-build failures as well due to the cpumask changes: > >> Yes. linux-next reported the same thing. I've backed out various > >> arch changes for this reason. > >> > >>> it seems to me that this commit is massively borked: > >>> > >>> 4a792c2: cpumask: make CONFIG_NR_CPUS always valid > >> Yep. This is the big one I dropped. There are a few others; Mike is > >> just porting the changes across to your tree now. > > > > guys. I already spent hours integrating the "latest" of this stuff today > > and established baseline quality for it on x86. I've dropped 4a792c2 and > > pushed out a new tip/cpus4096-v2, please send append-only patches for > > the rest of the changes. > > > > Ingo > > Ok, no problem. I was integrating in the changes you already made so > they would not be dropped. But I'll send "update" patches instead of > "replacement" patches if you prefer. how big are the deltas? You might send a single interdiff - it's supposed to be all small, right? Ingo