From: Nadia.Derbey@bull.net
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, cboulte@gmail.com
Cc: manfred@colorfullife.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nadia.Derbey@bull.net
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] (v2) SYSVIPC - Fix the ipc structures initialization
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:00:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081024060040.700343046@bull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081024060022.897705758@bull.net>
[-- Attachment #1: ipc-fix-sysvipc_structures_initialization.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2367 bytes --]
This patch is a fix for Bugzilla bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11796.
To summarize, a simple testcase is concurrently running an infinite loop on
msgctl(IPC_STAT) and a call to msgget():
while (1)
msgctl(id, IPC_STAT) 1
|
|
|
2 id = msgget(key, IPC_CREAT)
|
|
|
In the interval [1-2], the id doesn't exist yet.
In that test, the problem is the following:
When we are calling ipc_addid() from msgget() the msq structure is not
completely initialized. So idr_get_new() is inserting a pointer into the
idr tree, and the structure which is pointed to has, among other fields,
its lock uninitialized.
Since msgctl(IPC_STAT) is looping while (1), idr_find() returns the
pointer as soon as it is inserted into the IDR tree. And ipc_lock()
calls spin_lock(&mqs->lock), while we have not initialized that lock
yet.
This patch moves the spin_lock_init() before the call to ipc_addid().
It also sets the "deleted" flag to 1 in the window between ipc structure
allocation and its locking in ipc_addid().
Regards,
Nadia
Signed-off-by: Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@bull.net>
---
ipc/util.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6.27/ipc/util.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.27.orig/ipc/util.c 2008-10-23 15:20:46.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.27/ipc/util.c 2008-10-24 09:03:06.000000000 +0200
@@ -266,6 +266,17 @@ int ipc_addid(struct ipc_ids* ids, struc
if (ids->in_use >= size)
return -ENOSPC;
+ spin_lock_init(&new->lock);
+
+ /*
+ * We have a window between the time new is inserted into the idr
+ * tree and the time it is actually locked.
+ * In order to be safe during that window set the new ipc structure
+ * as deleted: a concurrent ipc_lock() will see it as not present
+ * until the initialization phase is complete.
+ */
+ new->deleted = 1;
+
err = idr_get_new(&ids->ipcs_idr, new, &id);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -280,7 +291,6 @@ int ipc_addid(struct ipc_ids* ids, struc
ids->seq = 0;
new->id = ipc_buildid(id, new->seq);
- spin_lock_init(&new->lock);
new->deleted = 0;
rcu_read_lock();
spin_lock(&new->lock);
--
next parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-24 6:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20081024060022.897705758@bull.net>
2008-10-24 6:00 ` Nadia.Derbey [this message]
2008-10-24 14:05 ` cboulte
2008-10-24 14:29 ` Nadia Derbey
2008-10-27 7:21 ` Nadia Derbey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081024060040.700343046@bull.net \
--to=nadia.derbey@bull.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cboulte@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome