Re: [PATCH] User namespaces: set of cleanups (v2)

[Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1372 bytes --]

Hi David,

On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 11:07:53 +0000 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> > It would be good if you could have a "next" (or "creds-next" or
> > something) branch in your tree and I can fetch that (that way I don't
> > have to keep updating my configs).  It is OK if thet branch rebases and
> > may just be an alias for another branch (or a subset if you have
> > experimental stuff in there.  Remember "posted, reviewed, tested before
> > it is in linux-next".
> 
> Those patches aren't likely to change much, and they get hit with LTP
> regularly.

They already changed between what I thought was the correct branch and
what was the correct branch :-)

> What base for the patches?  Linus's head?

Yes. Or whatever it is based on now if that merges OK with Linus' head
(try a test merge).  Just don't base on linux-next :-)

What I want is exactly what you will ask/have asked Linus to fetch but
without the branch name changing .. I care more about the name changing
than the contents changing.

So .. what branch do I fetch tomorrow?  (Hint: if you have your version
for Linus checked out then type "git branch next" and reply to this email
saying "next" :-))
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]