* Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm> wrote:

> > My estimation is that if we do it right, your approach will behave 
> > better on modern CPUs (which is what matters most for such 
> > things), especially on real workloads where there's a considerable 
> > instruction-cache pressure. But it should be measured in any case.
> 
> Fully agreed. I will do some measurements in the near future, maybe 
> next week. At least noone came up with an absolutely blocking 
> problem with this approach ;).

how about "it does not build with lguest enabled" as a blocking 
problem? ;-)

  arch/x86/lguest/built-in.o: In function `lguest_init_IRQ':
  boot.c:(.init.text+0x33f): undefined reference to `interrupt'

config attached.

	Ingo