From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: data corruption: revalidating a (removable) hdd/flash on re-insert
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 22:28:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081104212811.GC8349@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4910BD2B.1020808@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
On Wed 2008-11-05 00:22:51, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
>>>>> Every access to removable media is guarded by this revalidation check.
>>>>> If you don't see these events, you should not trust this reader, and
>>>>> at least never change the media while it is connected.
>>>> This is rather nasty data-corrupter.
>>> Sure, it is.
>>>
>>>> Could we at least blacklist
>>>> broken device, and force revalidation on each close or something like
>>>> that?
>>> What's your idea of revalidation if the hardware does not tell you?
>>> Get an md5 of the disk content? :)
>>
>> Well... you should not eject media while fs is mounted or blockdev is
>> open, correct?
>>
>> So can we simply claim 'media changed' on last close/unmount? Sure,
>> sometimes media was not changed, but that only hurts performance, not
>> correctness... ?
>
> Well, that's what my tiny proggy, which I used here to work around the
> problem, does. It constantly opens/closes the /dev/sdFOO, every 0.5s
> currently (I don't think I will be able to replace a media faster than
> half a second :), in order to catch REMOVALs of media -- because when
> the drive does not see the media anymore, it correctly reports that
> the media has changed...
Ok, so we you need to do is to put it into kernel and activate it
via blacklist...?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-04 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-31 15:38 Michael Tokarev
2008-10-31 15:59 ` Lennart Sorensen
2008-10-31 16:10 ` Michael Tokarev
2008-10-31 18:28 ` Lennart Sorensen
2008-10-31 16:10 ` Kay Sievers
2008-10-31 17:39 ` Michael Tokarev
2008-10-31 18:49 ` Kay Sievers
2008-11-04 19:57 ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-04 20:13 ` Kay Sievers
2008-11-04 20:20 ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-04 21:22 ` Michael Tokarev
2008-11-04 21:28 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2008-11-05 8:04 ` Michael Tokarev
2008-11-05 0:29 ` Kay Sievers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081104212811.GC8349@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®