From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754228AbYKFAVr (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2008 19:21:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752890AbYKFAVj (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2008 19:21:39 -0500 Received: from cmpxchg.org ([85.214.51.133]:40800 "EHLO cmpxchg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752812AbYKFAVi (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2008 19:21:38 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 1361 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:21:38 EST Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 00:58:42 +0100 From: Johannes Weiner To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Andrew Morton , Stephen Rothwell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, travis@sgi.com Subject: Re: Git next: Second stage of cpu_alloc patches Message-ID: <20081105235842.GB10909@cmpxchg.org> References: <20081104195205.fe1bf62b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 07:54:39AM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Ok so post a patchset to lkml and at the same time offer a git tree? Git is perhaps a more convenient way to pick up changesets compared to extracting them from emails but review and discussion should still happen by Email, no? Hannes