From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752839AbYKFOwB (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 09:52:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751082AbYKFOvx (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 09:51:53 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:47665 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750909AbYKFOvw (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 09:51:52 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:51:32 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Nick Piggin Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Memory Management List Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vmap: cope with vm_unmap_aliases before vmalloc_init() Message-ID: <20081106145132.GH13023@elte.hu> References: <49010D41.1080305@goop.org> <4911EB5C.4030901@goop.org> <20081106100234.GM4890@elte.hu> <200811062141.01437.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200811062141.01437.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE RBL: Envelope sender in blackholes.securitysage.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Nick Piggin wrote: > On Thursday 06 November 2008 21:02, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > > Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > >> Xen can end up calling vm_unmap_aliases() before vmalloc_init() has > > >> been called. In this case its safe to make it a simple no-op. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge > > > > > > Ping? Nick, Ingo: do you want to pick these up, or shall I send them to > > > Linus myself? > > > > i've applied them to tip/core/urgent and will send them to Linus > > unless Nick or Andrew has objections. > > Thanks, yeah ack from me on those. I'm generally expecting Andrew to > pick up and merge mm patches, but I guess he wasn't cc'ed this time. > Anyway, if Ingo gets them upstream, that would be fine too. linux-mm was Cc:-ed - but the crux of the changes was in Xen code, so i guess Andrew was looking at me and i was looking at him, expecting the other guy to do the work ;-) anyway, it's all queued up and tested now. Ingo